Educational standards and infrastructure available at several existing legal universities: Madras High Court
Educational standards, infrastructure in several existing universities need to be seen by the Madras High Court: “The possibility of an order must be sought all over India to ensure that the quality is not compromised for more law universities born and with the guise of opportunities created”, the court added.
While steps have been taken to ensure that new legal universities do not appear every day, there are concerns lingering for the educational standards and infrastructure available at several existing legal universities, Madras High Court recently observed (MD ASHOK v. The chief secretary of the government, the law department, Tamil Nadu and ORS).
Observations made by the court while dealing with petitions increasing concerns over the increasing of law college in Tamil Nadu.
“Fortunately, some concerns have been in the progress to ensure that legal universities do not appear every day in every locality. But the educational standards offer to several existing legal universities and available infrastructure also needs to be seen. This problem must observe, In-depth, by the bar council. The possibility of orders must be in vision at the level of all India. By the way, This is to ensure that the quality is not in compromise for more law universities born and with the guise of opportunities made, “says the court.
Bar council of India (BCI)
The State Bar council assure chief justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy that they were alert and that sufficient steps to undergo.
However, the Bar council shows that this problem must be handled at the PAN-India level, whether it is under the aegis of the bar council of India (BCI) or court order. Without this, this problem cannot handle properly, the court says.
Law college regulations – Legal Educational universities
The court also recognized this argument.
“There are substances in what the Bar Board says. It is because law college regulations in one state are not in accomplishment if legal Educational universities that are not in regulation in adjacent circumstances allow easy access. There are previous orders from this court relating to this problem. The only thing That can convey is for the bar council to be vigilant concerning this state. In fact, it is because it cannot exceed the boundaries,” they say.
The judge says the 2019 moratorium of BCI about opening a new law college, which relies on by the petitioner. All the same, the court shows that it cannot issue any mandamus in this matter as sought by the petitioner.
Easy access to legal universities in all neighboring countries
“Because it may be ineffective only to regulate the opening of law colleges within the boundaries of this section. Moreover, easy access to legal Educational universities in all neighboring countries will always be open, there is no significant sequence to issue at this level,” The bench Says.
Therefore, the court dismissed the plea while observing that it would open to the petitioner. This is to continue the Crusades, although by moving his request to a different level. The bar council can also consider the petitioner’s representation in the next four weeks, the court added.
Advocates M Madhuprakash appears for the applicant. The government of the Petitioner V Jayaprakash Narayanan emerged for the authority of Tamil Nadu. Finally, Advocates SR Raghunathan appeared for the Indian bar council
