Leading Law Firms & Top Lawyers in Chennai Madras High Court: Property Solicitors, Best Corporate Lawyers, Top Rated IPR Attorneys, DRT Lawyers, NCLT Advocates, Labour Legal consultants, Civil Litigation Lawyers, Criminal Advocates, Family Court Lawyers, NRI and Tax Legal Advisers
Lawyers Help for Intentional Interference Claim

INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE

WHAT IS INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE ?. Who is the Best Lawyer for Intentional Interference in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India ?.

Business markets encourage competition mostly in the first place. As a matter of fact, Sometimes things always go too far and competition may cross the line.

Competition may lead not only to improper pace but also it will become a tortuous conduct. That’s when court step in for intentional interference with a contract or business.

Best Lawyers for intentional interference legal issues in Chennai

Lawyers for intentional interference legal issues in Chennai are very rare. Rajendra Law office is one of the Top law of leading advocates in India.

For example, A business is in the final stages of its sale. Moreover, It’s not yet formalized in a written agreement. Someone could interfere with the sale of a business. Any person can also prompt someone to stop an informal business relationship and spoil the trade as well as reputation.

Best Lawyers for intentional interference legal issues in Chennai | What are all the Common Forms of Intentional Interference ?. | Lawyers Help for Intentional Interference Claim | Top Advocates for Intentional interference

What are all the Common Forms of Intentional Interference ?.

An individual can force / prompt someone to breach a contract using a third party in like manner. Again, It may happen in many ways. Breach can be because of offer for below market prices. They could threaten or blackmail someone into violating a contract. In fact, They could make it impossible for the other person to perform. They could receive the benefits of that contract example – by refusing to transport goods.

Remember, the act of the defendant must be intentional. Negligence alone is not enough. All intentional acts are not tortuous interference.

The Defendant

Defendant is the person who interferes with the contract or business relations. Interference can be through Inducement, blackmail, force or inappropriate or unethical practices also.

The Plaintiff

Victims are of 2 types in a Intentional interference case.

  • The person/s induced or forced into violating the terms of a contract or relationship,
  • Other parties to the contract who were bound by its terms. Yet they lost the benefit of the contract due to the interference.
  • Both types of victims can sue the person who committed the interference for any damages.

Elements of a Intentional Interference Claim

The basic elements of a Intentional interference claim are as follows:

  • A valid contract or business relationship between the plaintiff and a third person;
  • Knowledge of the contract or business relationship by the defendant
  • Intent by the defendant to interfere with the contract or business
  • Actual interference
  • The interference is improper
  • The plaintiff suffers damage.

Valid Contract or business relationship

The plaintiff must have valid contractual or business relations for Intentional interference claim . Suppose the contract or expectancy in question was not created. Suppose it violates public policy. The defendant will have no liability for its breach. The contract never existed. So the defendant couldn’t have caused its breach.

Certain contracts terminable at will present interesting situations for Intentional interference claims. A party can end a contract at will. It doesn’t give the defendant the ability to induce that termination in the same fashion. With intent if a defendant causes someone to end an at-will contractual or business. Plus if the motive for causing the termination is improper. The defendant gets held for Intentional interference.

Defendant’s Knowledge

In other words, the court needs to determine about the defendant’s knowledge of contract or business. If the defendant had no knowledge, then also there is intentional interference.

The plaintiff can show the defendant’s knowledge through an explicit statement or writing in short. He can also show defendant’s knowledge from circumstances surrounding the events in question.

Intent

The defendant must have intended to interfere with the contract or business expectancy. Then only the defendant is liable for Intentional interference.

Intent can mean two things here :

  • First, Explicit desire to interfere with the contract or expectancy by the defendant.
  • Second. There could be some other purpose in defendants mind. But acted with the knowledge that the interference was certain or not very certain .

Not every intentional interference is Intentional, either. In the light of fact, many valid business actions can hamper a contract or business relations. Only those actions with improper motives will amount to Intentional interference.

Actual Interference

Defendant’s actions must cause an actual interference to have a valid plaintiff claim by all means. When Defendant makes unsuccessful attempts to induce/force someone to break a contract. No Intentional interference has occurred.

Improper Interference

The intent of act or behavior explains acceptable interference from Intentional interference from time to time. When defendant has improper motivations for taking certain actions they become Intentional interference. Actions with a lawful motivation might not constitute a tort in brief.

For instance, Adam refused to do business with Bill. He learnt that Bill has a contract or business with an immoral firm to point out. Adam knows that his business is worth more to Bill than the other organization’s business. Hence, his refusal to deal could cause Bill to end his contract or business with the other company. Bill’s motivation is not improper in any event. Bill’s actions would not meet a claim of Intentional interference.

In any case, Adam wants to punish the other organization or put them out of business. He can do so by taking advantages of their relationship with Bill away. It is more likely that a Intentional interference has occurred in the same way.

Factors to Determine Improper Interference

The various factors that determine whether an interference was improper or not:

  • The type of conduct;
  • The actor’s motive.
  • The actor’s interests;
  • The interests of the other parties.
  • The social interests in protecting the contract and actor’s freedom of action;
  • How closely-related the actor’s behavior is to the intervention
  • The relationships between the parties.
  • Damages.

Once Intentional interference kick starts, the plaintiffs get entitled to damages. These damages include monetary loss, punitive damages and more by the same token.

Lawyers Help for Intentional Interference Claim

At this point, Business is a rough sport. Sometimes business relationships end and individuals and companies can suffer because of it.

Leading attorneys in Chennai to file a suit for Intentional interference

For aggrieved party, leading attorneys in Chennai only can file a suit for Intentional interference at any rate.

Best Advocates

Meanwhile, If you believe you’ve been the victim of Intentional interference, Contact the best advocate in practice of both criminal and Civil sides which includes employment law and  Industrial dispute resolution in Chennai

RSS
Follow by Email
YouTube
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Share